Most people these days are still reeling from the pandemic. The IRS and state governments are feeling the revenue pain too. One California bill with several cosponsors would increase the state’s already stratospheric top 13.3% income tax rate to 16.8%.
Not shocked yet? The newest tax some golden state legislators want to collect is a .4% wealth tax. The “leader” in state taxes already, this would be first-in-the nation wealth tax targeting the very wealthy. This isn’t on income they earn, mind you, but on their wealth itself. A summary of the bill says, “AB 2088 establishes a first-in-the-nation net worth tax, setting a 0.4% tax rate on all net worth above $30 million.” California Assembly member Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, proposed the legislation. The tax would be applied to the net worth of about 30,400 Californians, “raising approximately $7.5 billion annually,” the summary claims. “The tax takes into account all assets and liabilities held by an individual, globally, capturing the immense levels of accumulated wealth held by the top 0.1% of Californians.”
Various public employee and union groups are predictably behind the bill. So are environmental groups such as the Sierra Club. The targeted individuals may be eyeing a move out of California, but meanwhile, some observers think the wealth tax rate should be even higher. There are administrative nightmares too. Wealth isn’t about income, but about assets. How do you determine the value of everything you own? For example, what about stock options in private companies? You can bet that you might say one figure, and the notoriously aggressive Franchise Tax Board might say something quite different. That could prompt more than just billionaire CEO Elon Musk threatening to abandon California.would raise it to 16.8% retroactively. Proponents say the higher taxes would make for a more equitable tax structure. Even before any proposed changes, California’s top 1% of income earners already pay most of the state’s personal income tax revenue (a whopping 46% in 2016). The top 5% accounted for two-thirds of personal income tax that year. Yet AB 1253 (Santiago), would impose even higher taxes, and retroactively to January 1, 2020.
If passed, high income Californians would pay another 1% on income over $1,181,484, 3% on income over $2,362,968, and 3.5% on income over $5,907,420. These dollar thresholds look odd, but are $1M, $2M and $5M plus inflation adjustments. They would hit only very high income Californians, hiking California’s tax rate on income over $1 million from 13.3% to 14.3%. California’s highest rate would be a whopping 16.8%. You can read Assembly Bill 1253 for yourself. If it passes, it could cause some Californians to hop in their Teslas and head for Texas, Nevada or Washington state, which have no state income taxes. In fact, moving to any other state would mean lower state taxes. The current top 13.3% rate—which it is worth noting is the same on ordinary income and capital gain—dates from 2012. With the 2018 federal tax law changes, paying 13.3% in non-deductible state taxes (after a $10,000 cap) is even more painful.
Moving sounds easy, but if you aren’t careful how you do it, you could end up leaving California, yet being asked to keep paying California taxes. California has a broad reach into other states, and in some cases, California can assess taxes no matter where you live. Should this discourage you? No, but it pays to know what you are up against.
Many would-be former Californians have a hard time distancing themselves from California, and they may not plan on California tax authorities pursuing them. Those rules are unforgiving, and when fighting California tax bills, procedure counts. Your exposure to audit can also be frightening. The IRS can audit 3 or 6 years, but California can sometimes audit forever. Several things can give the FTB an unlimited amount of time to audit you. California, like the IRS, gets unlimited time if you never file an income tax return, yet some people worry that saying goodbye to California taxes can mean hello residency audit. Yet the fact that the top tax rate could be raised to 16.8 retroactively, could put some people on the move, despite the audit risk
To view the original blog click here.
By clicking on any of the links mentioned above, you acknowledge that they are solely for your convenience, not required to click. They do not necessarily imply any affiliations, sponsorships, endorsements or representations whatsoever by us regarding third-party Web sites. We are not responsible for the content, availability or privacy policies of these sites, and shall not be responsible or liable for any information, opinions, advice, products or services available on or through them.
The opinions expressed by myself and other featured authors are their own and may not accurately reflect those of Lifeguard Wealth. This article is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice.
© 2020, Lifeguard Wealth